Effective defense means avoiding being struck, taken down or reversed while countering with offensive attacks. The following objective scoring criteria shall be utilized by the judges when scoring a round: Judges shall use a sliding scale and recognize the length of time the fighters are either standing or on the ground, as follows: Effective grappling is weighed first; and Effective striking is then weighed If the mixed martial artists spent a majority of a round standing, then: Effective striking is weighed first; and Effective grappling is then weighed A round is to be scored as a round when a contestant overwhelmingly dominates by striking or grappling in a round.
If a round ends with a relatively even amount of standing and canvas fighting, striking and grappling are weighed equally. Automate your business with Zoho One. No multi-year contracts and no multiple versions. Sign Up at zoho. How do you score in UFC fights? How does the UFC competition and scoring work? What moves are illegal in UFC fights?
Why are most UFC fighters white? Types of Contest Results C. Decision via the scorecards, including: Unanimous Decision - When all three judges score the contest for the same contestant ii. Split Decision - When two judges score the contest for one contestant and one judge scores for the opponent iii. Majority Decision - When two judges score the contest for the same contestant and one judge scores a draw D.
Unanimous Draw - When all three judges score the contest a draw ii. Majority Draw - When two judges score the contest a draw iii. Split Draw - When all three judges score differently. Thank you for your feedback! The score is based of: Effective striking - This is determined by how many legal strikes are landed. Effective grappling - How many successful take-downs and reversals are executed. Also threatening submissions attempts, positions to mount the opponent, passing the guard position, and striking opportunities the fighter creates on the ground.
Basically this means that the fighter that is willing to go forward and probably corner his opponent against the cage during the fight. Effective aggressiveness - Just moving forward landing a legal strike, like a running knee. Effective defense - To avoid take-downs and counter attacks. Increase your influence by creating a video course on Udemy. The fight is scored round-by-round on a ten-point "must" system, meaning the winner must get ten points, with the loser getting nine or less.
Most rounds are scored ; if a fighter wins all three rounds, the score will be , and if his opponent won one of the rounds, the score will be Points may be deducted by the referee for illegal techniques, though usually they get a warning first.
Generally, only one point will be deducted per offense. Also, if a fighter has a poor round, instead of the score being for the round, it may be judged a or round. The judging criteria is "effective striking, effective grappling, aggression, and octagon ring control". Some of these terms are very subjective. If one fighter lands more punches, but the other fighter did more damage with his strikes, who is said to have more effective striking?
But the fights are not scored by punch, takedown, or submission attempt as quantitative scores. They may be qualitative, but again, it's up to the judge to determine how much a takedown, sub attempt, and strike is valued to them. Unfortunately, the lack of standardized judging criteria is causing some headaches in the sport of MMA. And yes, it does seem like there are many punches that land on the back of the head. Unlike many other striking sports, MMA allows for strikes in the clinch and on the ground, where the opponent may not be facing you.
That explains the frequency of these strikes. For the best answers, search on this site https: There are the obvious ways to win: Knockout, self explanatory Referee stoppage fighter is no longer intelligently defending himself , Doctor stoppage fighter is no longer able to safely continue fighting , Submission, verbal or by "tapping" and a corner can throw in a towel essentially surrendering.
The judges score the fights on a 10 round must system. Meaning there has to be a winner of a round. One fighter gets a The other guy gets a 9, or if he was completely dominated an uneffective possibly an 8.
So in this you hear the judges score a round a for fighter A, or a for fighter B, or for fighter A, etc. Meaning Fighter A won the 10 points for that round, and fighter B won 9 or 8 points. Since there are 3 rounds, or 5 rounds, being odd numbers, it means that normally it should not end in a draw. Let's take a 3 round fight. Whomever wins this wins the right.
Since they would then have 29 to another fighters The judges are supposed to base this score on effectiveness i. Who is landing more shots, inflicting more damage, landing more techniques aggression, meaning which fighter is attempting to fight, not backing off but pursuing the fight and octagon control essentially who is keeping the center of the ring, dictating the fight, and essentially using the most ringsmanship As many of this is open for intrepretation, especially given a close fight.
Even experts are sometimes completely baffled by a judges decision. There is also plenty of times of distinct variance in judging. Due to the fact that certain judges have certain biases about what they like to see, or what they feel is more effective, or what takes priority. One judge may put more worth into a fighter who presses the action, while the other fighter might not be pressing the action but is using better ringsmanship, and landing cleaner shots, therefore another judge favors him for this reason.
That is why there are 3 judges, so that there is a balance, which means that 2 of them have to declare one winner. McGregor was utterly dominant over the course of the first round and a half, before Diaz, as his wont, rallied hard as the third beckoned. However, the Dubliner knocked Diaz to the canvas three times before the Californian gained a foothold — once in the first and twice in the second.
Diaz seriously kicked into gear in the third and, quite conceivably, could have ended the bout before the buzzer sounded, but McGregor dug deep. His colleagues both awarded the American a The fourth frame saw each man inflict and absorb their share of damage and, judging by the reaction on social media, was arguably the most divisive of the fight.
Like McGregor in the fourth, Diaz was awarded a clean sweep of for the fifth. Separating the fighters in that moment would have been no mean feat, hence the heightened anticipation as Bruce Buffer read out the final tallies which revealed McGregor as the victor. It must be noted as slightly strange that not one judge felt compelled to award McGregor a for the first or second rounds, but Trowbridge thought Diaz warranted it for the third.
Accordingly, it was that score that meant he declared the contest a draw, and prevented McGregor from taking a unanimous verdict. As is the case in nearly all sporting endeavours, the statistics can be misleading in MMA, but they are certainly worth consulting after the barnburner Messrs McGregor and Diaz conjured. For the times a bout is contested on the feet, they collate all the strikes and significant strikes , both attempted and landed.
Unfortunately, and to the great frustration of so many, there are no official definitions for strikes or significant strikes. Recently, UFC analyst and former title challenger, Dan Hardy, who is also an accredited judge, deemed significant strikes as follows: Not the peppering point-scoring stuff. Anyway, according to Fight Metric, Diaz landed more strikes and significant strikes than McGregor, but the latter was more accurate. In total, the American found a home for of the strikes he attempted.
His landing percentage was 48 pc.